“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final observed.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority of your parent department with the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Case files may be accessed from the public access terminals while in the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for your Supreme Court in the United States is obtainable on the court’s website.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. In the event the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity within the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the obvious negation from the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more
The Court viewed as the case to become maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the Risk and encroachment alleged were which include to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the varied reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station resulting from probable health risks and dangers.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may result in reduced charges or acquittal.
10. Without touching the merits in the case in the issue of annual increases while in the pensionary emoluments of the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, these annual increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment being made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the more info grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are recognized by executive companies based on statutes.